Project snapshot: AI Intake Assistant for Sales + CRM Hygiene (anonymized)
An AI intake assistant captured lead details from emails/forms/calls, enriched and normalized fields, and routed opportunities to the right owner with clean context.
Proof / metrics
- Faster first-response time
- Reduced manual data entry
- Lower duplicate rate in CRM
- Higher conversion from inquiry → qualified meeting
System architecture
Purpose: Show a practical “intake + routing” pattern that turns unstructured inbound info into structured CRM-ready data.
Primary CTA: Let's talk
TL;DR
An AI intake assistant captured lead details from emails/forms/calls, enriched and normalized fields, and routed opportunities to the right owner with clean context.
The workflow
Problem: Leads arrived from multiple channels with inconsistent detail; slow follow-up; messy CRM data; unclear ownership.
What we automated:
- Extract structured fields from inbound inquiries (company, role, need, timeline)
- Ask 1–3 targeted follow-up questions (email or form flow) when critical info is missing
- Create/update CRM records and assign ownership based on rules
- Produce a short “sales-ready” summary and next-step recommendation
What stayed human-led:
- Pricing negotiation and discovery calls
- Final qualification decisions for edge cases
Constraints
- Data correctness mattered more than “automation rate”
- Avoid duplicate CRM records
- Provide auditability (what was inferred vs. explicitly provided)
- Be conservative with enrichment; don’t introduce unverifiable data
Approach
Intake design
- Define a minimum viable lead schema (the handful of fields sales actually needs)
- Treat uncertain fields as unknown, not guessed
- Keep follow-ups short and specific
CRM + routing
- Deduping strategy (email domain + company + fuzzy match)
- Routing rules (territory, industry, product line, round-robin)
- Human review step for low-confidence matches
Guardrails
- Don’t fabricate company details; use verified sources or leave blank
- Log decisions and confidence signals for later tuning
High-level architecture
- Inbound channels → normalization layer
- Agent orchestrator with tool calls:
- CRM read/write
- enrichment (where permitted)
- messaging (email/Slack) for follow-ups/notifications
- Observability: routing outcomes, correction rate, response-time
Launch + iteration
Rollout pattern (typical):
- Start with one inbound channel (e.g., web form) and a strict schema
- Add additional channels (email, chat, call summaries) once the schema and routing rules are stable
- Weekly review: measure correction rate and iterate on extraction rules + follow-up questions
Operational readiness:
- Monitoring: time-to-first-response, routing failures, dedupe collisions, correction rate
- Human-in-the-loop: low-confidence fields flagged for review rather than silently written
Measurement
Success metrics (examples):
- Faster first-response time
- Reduced manual data entry
- Lower duplicate rate in CRM
- Higher conversion from inquiry → qualified meeting
Metric placeholders we’ll define with you:
- Target reduction in manual field entry: set after baseline (by field coverage)
- Target reduction in duplicate creation: set after baseline (dedupe rules + data quality)
- Target improvement in response-time SLA: set after baseline (by inquiry type)
Outcome (MVP-safe)
The intake assistant improved data consistency and routing speed for standard inquiries, while keeping humans in control for ambiguous or high-value leads.
If you want this pattern
- Ideal if your inbound inquiries are unstructured and your CRM is a bottleneck.
- Works best when sales agrees on a shared schema and routing rules.
CTA: Let's talk
At a glance
Purpose
Show a practical “intake + routing” pattern that turns unstructured inbound info into structured CRM-ready data.
Primary CTA
Let's talk
Delivery
Phased build, production instrumentation, and a clear handoff.
Proof / metrics
- Faster first-response time
- Reduced manual data entry
- Lower duplicate rate in CRM
- Higher conversion from inquiry → qualified meeting
What we typically ship
- Agent workflow map + success criteria
- Integrations with your CRM/helpdesk/calendar
- Monitoring, logs, and escalation paths
- Guardrails and safe failure modes

